About this Blog

During the semester, I shall post course material and students will comment on it. Students are also free to comment on any aspect of the presidency, either current or historical. There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.

Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

The Shadows Stretch to the Present Day

For Monday, read Edwards ch. 3.

Questions on the paper?

For your writeup, take another look at Ike's Farewell Address.  In 1961, he foresaw problems that would beset his successors and the country as a whole. Other than "the military-industrial complex," briefly discuss one of those problems.


Why did Kennedy go by his initials?

Why did Kennedy conceal his health problems?

Then came Dallas

Kennedy:



LBJ 

With FDR and TX Governor James Allred, 1937


Early Senate campaign button:


LBJ's program was The Great Society.  Medicare was its key achievement.  Signing the Medicare bill, LBJ said:
In 1935 when the man that both of us loved so much, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, signed the Social Security Act, he said it was, and I quote him, "a cornerstone in a structure which is being built but it is by no means complete."

Well, perhaps no single act in the entire administration of the beloved Franklin D. Roosevelt really did more to win him the illustrious place in history that he has as did the laying of that cornerstone. And I am so happy that his oldest son Jimmy could be here to share with us the joy that is ours today. And those who share this day will also be remembered for making the most important addition to that structure, and you are making it in this bill, the most important addition that has been made in three decades.

Nixon:

Schoen: How could a political moderate be so polarizing? 

Impact on the presidency

  • OMB and WH staff
  • Communications
Nixon and his successors


Ford:  the veep
Carter: the anti-Nixon
Reagan: the frenemy
Bush:  the appointee
Clinton: Kennedy fanboy and Nixon doppelganger



"So what did you think of him?" I asked Richard Nixon after his first meeting with Bill Clinton.
"You know," Mr. Nixon replied, "he came from dirt and I came from dirt. He lost a gubernatorial race and came back to win the Presidency, and I lost a gubernatorial race and came back to win the Presidency. He overcame a scandal in his first campaign for national office and I overcame a scandal in my first national campaign. We both just gutted it out. He was an outsider from the South and I was an outsider from the West."

Bush 43, then Obama

Franklin Delano Obama?

Similarities between 2008 and 1932?

Differences in the political and institutional setting? 




Monday, February 9, 2026

The Shadow of FDR

For Wednesday, read the Schoen chapters on Nixon (Canvas).

Questions on the paper?

Coolidge:

Hoover

Connections

FDR a distant cousin of TR, who gave away Eleanor at their wedding. The connection helped him get the VP nomination in 1920 but he also moved away from the Roosevelt Corollary with The Good Neighbor Policy.

FDR and Wilson

  • FDR served as Woodrow Wilson’s Assistant Secretary of the Navy from 1913–1920: was also in touch with his British counterpart, Winston Churchill
  • Wilson's "New Freedom" program was a template for the New deal and war leadership provided a model for FDR, who later adopted similar interventionist approaches to economic crises and global conflict. 
  • WWI precedents for WWII;  financing through bonds, extensive use of propaganda; J. Edgar Hoover.
  • League of Nations was both a model and a cautionary tale.
FDR expands presidential hard power:

  • Comparisons with Trump
  • Inaugural address (4:00)
  • The New Deal and Administrative State
  • Influence over Congress and the 100 Days
  • Executive Office of the President and WH staff
  • Supreme Court
    • Failed court-packing scheme
    • But eventually got a liberal majority
  • War Powers: 
    • Rationing and economic control
    • Military establishment
    • Internment of Japanese Americans under Executive Order 9066. 
FDR Soft Power
Ike does not repeal the New Deal, instead warns of the military-industrial complex that had started to grow under FDR

JFK
  • Joe Kennedy was first head of the SEC and Ambassador to Britain
  • 1960 campaign, clutching the hem of FDR's garment


Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Sprinting Though Presidential History: From Lincoln to the 20th Century

PRESENTATION ON THE DC PROGRAM

QUESTIONS ON THE ASSIGNMENT?

FOR YOUR WRITEUP, DISCUSS ONE THING THAT SURPRISED YOU ABOUT ONE PRESIDENT WHO SERVED BETWEEN THE FOUNDING AND 1920

FOR MONDAY, READ 

  • William Leuchtenberg, In the Shadow of FDR, 4th ed. (Cornell University Press, 2009), excerpts.  TWO CHAPTERS ON CANVAS.
  • Eisenhower's 1961 farewell address
  • Gregory Frame, "The Myth of John F. Kennedy in Film and Television," Film & History (Winter 2016).  ON CANVAS.

.The Very Long Shadow of the Civil War



Between 1876 and 1892, no president won a majority of the popular vote:

1876 Hayes.......... 48.0*
1880 Garfield.......48.3
1884 Cleveland.....48.5
1888 Harrison.......47.8*
1892 Cleveland......46.1

McKinley
  • Imperialism and the Spanish-American War: Puerto Rico, Guam, Philippines -- and a few years later, Gitmo
  • Hawaii
  • Pioneered modern presidential communication and campaign finance, 
  • Assassination led to permanent Secret Service protection.

Roosevelt: "My view was that every executive officer, and above all every executive officer in high position, was a steward of the people bound actively and affirmatively to do all he could for the people, and not to content himself with the negative merit of keeping his talents undamaged in a napkin."
  • "Bully Pulpit" and the rhetorical presidency
  • Executive orders to create 150 national forests, federal bird reservations, and game preserves, protecting roughly 200 million acres
  • Trust-Busting 
  • Legislative advocacy and the Hepburn Act
  • Foreign Policy: the "Big Stick"Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine.
  • Outside the box: involvement in labor disputes and even in football!  Precedent for reaching far beyond fedeal policy.
Taft: Constitution and the presidency: "The true view of the Executive functions is, as I conceive it, that the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise."

Wilson: "The President is at liberty, both in law and conscience, to be as big a man as he can. His capacity will set the limit; and if Congress be overborne by him, it will be no fault of the makers of the Constitution, — it will be from no lack of constitutional powers on its part, but only because the President has the nation behind him, and Congress has not. He has no means of compelling Congress except through public opinion."
  • Rhetorical presidency and SOTU
  • "New Freedom" Agenda
  • Economic regulation:  Federal Reserve and FTC
  • Racism: WW grew up in Virginia during and after the Civil War
    • Segregated the civil service
    • Promoted The Birth of Nation, which quoted one of his books:

  • WWI and Versailles
  • WWI and War Power
    • Propaganda: The Committee on Public Information (CPI), or Creel Committee, drummed up support for World War I. with posters, films, and 75,000 "Four-Minute Men" speakers, to "sell" the war to Americans.  CPI strategist Edward Bernays wrote: “Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government.”
    • Repression: arrest and imprisonment of opponents. About  2,000 prosecutions under the Sedition Act, and 6,000 arrests in the 1919-1920 Palmer Raids -- the first "Red Scare."  A rising star was young J. Edgar Hoover
   





First Assignment, Spring 2026

Pick one:

Option 1

Interview one person aged 30 or older (by phone, Zoom, or email). Ask that person to identify her or his favorite or least-favorite U.S. president from before Donald Trump’s first term, excluding Washington and Lincoln. (It can be a president from the interviewee's lifetime or one from the history books.) In your paper, reconstruct the logic of the interviewee’s judgment. Tell how that person’s background and formative political experiences plausibly shaped that view of the presidency and this president. Your goal is not to decide whether the interviewee is “right,” but to explain why that view makes sense for someone like that person, and how individual memory intersects with presidential performance and public opinion.

Ground your analysis in evidence. Quote directly from your interview (with the interviewee’s permission). Where appropriate, use survey data to situate the interviewee’s view within broader public opinion. Use the historical record (policies, crises, institutional constraints) to tell why Americans viewed this president  positively or negatively at the time and how those views have endured or changed.


Option 2

Pick one U.S. president who served before Eisenhower. Then find a pro-1960 high school or college textbook on American history, civics, or government. (At Honnold Library, textbooks are on the first floor of Mudd, under LOC code LT.) Compare how that book portrayed the president with what we know now.  Using modern historical scholarship, biographies, and primary sources now available, explain how scholars understand this president today. 

The specifications:

  • Essays should be typed (12-point), double-spaced, and no more than four pages long. I will not read past the fourth page. 
  • Please submit all papers in this course as Word documents, not Google docs or pdfs.
  • Read Strunk & White and my stylesheet (with links to model papers)Watch my writing lecture.
  • Cite your sources. Please use endnotes in the format of the Chicago Manual of Style.  Endnotes do not count against the page limit. Please do not use footnotes, which take up too much page space.
  • Misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own work is plagiarism and will result in severe consequences
  • Watch your spelling, grammar, diction, and punctuation. Errors will count against you. Return essays to the Canvas dropbox for this class by 11:59 PM, Friday, February 20. (If you have trouble with Canvas, simply email it to me as an attached file.) I reserve the right to dock papers one gradepoint for one day’s lateness, a full letter grade after that.
See this page for Internet resources on the presidency.





Monday, February 2, 2026

Sprinting Through Presidential History: From Washington to Super Grover

For next time:

Apocryphal quotation by George III:  He asked artist Benjamin West what Washington would do if American became independent. "He believed He would retire to a private situation.—The King said if He did He would be the greatest man in the world.”  If he did say such a thing, why?


Treasury Secretary, Washington's the President
Ev'ry American experiment sets a precedent
-- From Hamilton

Washington Inauguration




Presidential power:  Neutrality, Pacificus and Helvidius.  The Neutrality Proclamation set a precedent for presidential power in foreign policy?

The Whiskey Rebellion -- precedent for assertion of federal authority

May the children of the stock of Abraham who dwell in this land continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other inhabitants—while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid.

May the father of all mercies scatter light, and not darkness, upon our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in His own due time and way everlastingly happy.

;br />

Farewell Address:
Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people under an efficient government. the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.
Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?
It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.
The Election of 1800




In the discussions to which this interest has given rise and in the arrangements by which they may terminate the occasion has been judged proper for asserting, as a principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are involved, that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers
. . .

With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere. But with the Governments who have declared their independence and maintain it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European power in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.

 Andrew Jackson

Lincoln

The Very Long Shadow of the Civil War


Between 1876 and 1892, no president won a majority of the popular vote:

1876 Hayes.......... 48.0*
1880 Garfield.......48.3
1884 Cleveland.....48.5
1888 Harrison.......47.8*
1892 Cleveland......46.1





Wednesday, January 28, 2026

The Constitution and the Presidency

For the write-up, answer one of the discussion questions at the end of the chapter 2. (Again, 250 words max)

For Monday:

In appraising presidents, consider not only what they did but what they refrained from doing.  (See Ike, for instance)

ARTICLE II

Section 1

The Vesting Clause (Edwards 20-21): "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."

Why only one president?  Why not a troika or a board?   Do US states have a form of plural executive power?

Federalist 70 and plurality in the executive:
But one of the weightiest objections to a plurality in the Executive, and which lies as much against the last as the first plan, is, that it tends to conceal faults and destroy responsibility. Responsibility is of two kinds -- to censure and to punishment. The first is the more important of the two, especially in an elective office. Man, in public trust, will much oftener act in such a manner as to render him unworthy of being any longer trusted, than in such a manner as to make him obnoxious to legal punishment. But the multiplication of the Executive adds to the difficulty of detection in either case. It often becomes impossible, amidst mutual accusations, to determine on whom the blame or the punishment of a pernicious measure, or series of pernicious measures, ought really to fall. It is shifted from one to another with so much dexterity, and under such plausible appearances, that the public opinion is left in suspense about the real author. The circumstances which may have led to any national miscarriage or misfortune are sometimes so complicated that, where there are a number of actors who may have had different degrees and kinds of agency, though we may clearly see upon the whole that there has been mismanagement, yet it may be impracticable to pronounce to whose account the evil which may have been incurred is truly chargeable.

Unitary Theory of the Executive -- the most extreme form

"Natural born citizen" -- Why?

Election of the president -- for Feb 16, 18.

Vacancies -- see also 25th Amendment and Presidential Succession Act.  The problem with Designated Survivor

The oath (keep in mind next week when we discuss Lincoln).  


What he actually swore on:



Roberts screwed up:


Section 2

"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States" (Edwards 47-49).

"[He] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."


"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States..." 

Section 3

"He] shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States."

Sunday, January 25, 2026

A First Look at Presidential Power and Leadership

For Wednesday, read The Constitution, Article II

What is leadership?  The Founders usually used the word leader in a negative sense.

Director or Facilitator?

A related distinction

Approaches 

Legal

Institutional 

Political Power
  • Support from the general public and specific constituencies.  How do they attain and retain it?
  • Money
  • Alliances with political elites
Psychological
  • Psychobiographies
    • Incomplete evidence (esp. for living presidents)
    • Reductionism and bad theory
    • Bias
  • Studies of group dynamics and cognition are more valuable

Also:  the trappings and prestige of the office.  See Carter at 2:18
        
Something to keep in mind during any discussion of presidential power: Where you stand depends on where you sit, or whom you support. Take signing statements:

May 19, 2008, in Billings, Montana


Also consider not only what they did but what they refrained from doing.

Why only one president?  Why not a troika or a board?   Do US states have a form of plural executive power>?

Federalist 70 and plurality in the executive:
But one of the weightiest objections to a plurality in the Executive, and which lies as much against the last as the first plan, is, that it tends to conceal faults and destroy responsibility. Responsibility is of two kinds -- to censure and to punishment. The first is the more important of the two, especially in an elective office. Man, in public trust, will much oftener act in such a manner as to render him unworthy of being any longer trusted, than in such a manner as to make him obnoxious to legal punishment. But the multiplication of the Executive adds to the difficulty of detection in either case. It often becomes impossible, amidst mutual accusations, to determine on whom the blame or the punishment of a pernicious measure, or series of pernicious measures, ought really to fall. It is shifted from one to another with so much dexterity, and under such plausible appearances, that the public opinion is left in suspense about the real author. The circumstances which may have led to any national miscarriage or misfortune are sometimes so complicated that, where there are a number of actors who may have had different degrees and kinds of agency, though we may clearly see upon the whole that there has been mismanagement, yet it may be impracticable to pronounce to whose account the evil which may have been incurred is truly chargeable.
"I was overruled by my council. The council were so divided in their opinions that it was impossible to obtain any better resolution on the point." These and similar pretexts are constantly at hand, whether true or false. And who is there that will either take the trouble or incur the odium, of a strict scrunity into the secret springs of the transaction? Should there be found a citizen zealous enough to undertake the unpromising task, if there happen to be collusion between the parties concerned, how easy it is to clothe the circumstances with so much ambiguity, as to render it uncertain what was the precise conduct of any of those parties?
The oath (keep in mind next week when we discuss Lincoln).  Roberts screwed up: