About this Blog

During the semester, I shall post course material and students will comment on it. Students are also free to comment on any aspect of the presidency, either current or historical. There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.

Search This Blog

Friday, January 16, 2026

CMC Presidency Syllabus Spring 2026

Gov 102 Syllabus Fall 2025

DRAFT: SUBJECT TO CHANGE

American Presidency
CMC Government 102 Spring 2026
MW 11 AM - 12:15 PM
Roberts North 15

J.J. Pitney
Office: Kravis 232


Student Hours
  • Monday and Wednesday, 1-2 PM, and whenever I am in my office and not looking grumpy.
  • If these times are inconvenient, just make an appointment for an in-person or Zoom meeting.
Purpose of the Course

Few offices shape American life more than the presidency, and few have changed more radically. Recent presidents have stretched executive power in ways that would have surprised the Framers, while Congress, the courts, and the bureaucracy have responded unevenly. Executive orders, emergency powers, polarization, social media, and nonstop crises have transformed how presidents govern and how the public judges them. This course equips you to move beyond partisan reactions and social media narratives, giving you the analytical tools to understand what presidents can do, what they should do, and what the future of the office may hold.

This course will pose these questions:
  • How does the Constitution both empower and restrain the president?
  • How do the decisions and reputations of past presidents affect the choices of their successors?
  • How and why has power shifted between the White House and Congress?
  • How do presidents manage aides and agencies?
  • What does it take to win and keep the presidency?
  • How do presidents make high-stakes decisions on war, diplomacy, and domestic policy?
  • And where is the American presidency headed next?
By the end of the course, you should be able to analyze presidential power with precision, skepticism, and historical perspective, and to see beyond headlines to the institutional forces at work.

Classes

Class meetings combine lecture and discussion. Come prepared: completing the readings before class is essential, since discussion will assume familiarity with them.

We will also regularly connect course material to breaking news, so you should follow a high-quality daily news source such as Axios or Politico. Presidential power does not operate in a vacuum, and neither will this course.

Blog

Our class blog is at https://gov102.blogspot.com/. I will post videos, graphs, news stories, and supplemental material there throughout the semester. Some of this content will come up in class; the rest is there to deepen your understanding at your own pace.

You will receive an invitation to post on the blog (let me know if you don’t). I strongly encourage you to use it to:

  • Raise questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
  • Extend or challenge points from class discussions;
  • Share relevant news stories, data, or videos about Congress

Think of the blog as an extension of the classroom.

Grades

Your course grade will have these components:
  • Two four-page essays — 20% each
  • One three-page essay — 15%
  • One six-page essay — 30%
  • Participation and weekly reflections — 15%
The papers will sharpen your research, analytical, and writing skills. Writing quality matters. In grading, I will apply the principles of Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style. If you object to this standard, you should not take this course -- or any other course I teach.

In addition to the assigned readings, I may distribute documents, data, and links related to current events or background material. Your papers may draw on and analyze these sources.

Participation includes both in-class and online engagement. I will call on students at random. Frequent absences or lack of preparation will affect your grade. The goal is not to catch you unprepared, but to hone your ability to think clearly and respond effectively under pressure.  This skill matters far beyond college.

Finally, by Thursday of each week, you will email me a brief reflection (no more than 250 words) responding to the readings and class discussions. These reflections will help you process the material and develop your own analytical voice.


Details
Required Book

  • George C. Edwards III, Kenneth R. Mayer, Stephen J. Wayne, Presidential Leadership: Politics and Policy Making, 13th ed. (Rowman and Littlefield/Bloomsbury, 2025).

 Also see links on my Presidency page.

Schedule (subject to change, with notice)

Jan 21:  Introduction

"Do not put your trust in princes, in human beings, who cannot save." -- Psalm 146:3.

Jan 26, 28: Presidential Power

Hamilton: Mr. President, they will say you’re weak...
Washington: No, they will see we’re strong...
Hamilton: Your position is so unique...
Washington: So I’ll use it to move them along.
-- Lin-Manuel Miranda, "One Last Time," in Hamilton

Feb 2, 4:  Sprinting Through Presidential History, Part I

"Viewed from the genuine abolition ground, Mr. Lincoln seemed tardy, cold, dull, and indifferent; but measuring him by the sentiment of his country, a sentiment he was bound as a statesman to consult, he was swift, zealous, radical, and determined." -- Frederick Douglass

Four-page paper assigned Feb 4, due Feb 20.
Read Strunk and White first.

Feb 9, 11:  Sprinting Through Presidential History, Part II

"Franklin Roosevelt was the first President I ever voted for, the first to serve in my lifetime that I regarded as a hero, and the first I ever actually saw."  - Ronald Reagan
  • William Leuchtenberg, In the Shadow of FDR, 4th ed. (Cornell University Press, 2009), excerpts.  ON CANVAS.
  • Eisenhower's 1961 farewell address
  • Gregory Frame, "The Myth of John F. Kennedy in Film and Television," Film & History (Winter 2016).  ON CANVAS.
  • Douglas E. Schoen, The Nixon Effect: How Richard Nixon's Presidency Fundamentally Changed American Politics (New York: Encounter, 2016), excerpts ON CANVAS.

Feb 16, 18: Presidential Selection 

"It’s not the voting that’s democracy; it’s the counting." -- Tom Stoppard

  • Edwards, ch. 3-4.

Feb 23, 25: The Public Presidency I

"ACTION IS CHARACTER." -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

Four-page essay assigned Feb 23, due Mar 13.

Mar 2, 4:  The Public Presidency II

"We once wrote, `This nation will prepare.  We will not live in fear.  We choose to fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here,' only to read it aloud and realize it sounded less like Winston Churchill than Dr. Seuss." -- Matthew Scully, on writing for George W. Bush

  • Edwards, ch. 6-7.
Mar. 9, 11: The Structure of the Presidency

"All vice presidents eat enormous bowls of feces. That's the job." -- Jonah Goldberg (P `25)
  • Edwards, ch. 8-9.

    Mar  16: 18: Spring Break


    Mar 23, 25:  The Executive Branch


    "[The] first opinion which one forms of a prince, and of his understanding, is by observing the men he has around him; and when they are capable and faithful he may always be considered wise, because he has known how to recognize the capable and to keep them faithful. But when they are otherwise one cannot form a good opinion of him, for the prime error which he made was in choosing them. -- Machiavelli

    • Edwards, ch. 10.
    Mar 30, Apr 1:  The President and Congress

    "If Donald Trump says 'Jump three feet high and scratch your heads,' we all jump three feet high and scratch our heads." -- Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX)

    Apr 6, 8 Judiciary and Civil Rights

    "[T]he data suggests that in the 13 appellate courts, there is increasingly such a thing as a Trump judge. The president’s appointees voted to allow his policies to take effect 133 times and voted against them only 12 times. Ninety-two percent of their total votes were in favor of the administration." -- Mattathias Schwartz and Emma Schartz, NY Times

    • Edwards, ch. 12
    Six-page paper due April 17.

    Apr 13, 15Foreign Policy and National Security I

    President Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space… This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”
    President Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”–Exchange between President Obama and Dmitri Medvedev, on hot mic, March 26, 2012

    Three-page paper assigned Apr 20, 
    due by May 6

    Apr 20, 22: Foreign Policy and National Security II

    General Anthony Brady: "We've already lost one American city, sir. How many more do you want to risk?"
    POTUS: "What kind of f------ question is that? That's insanity, okay?"
    General Anthony Brady: "No, Mister President. That's reality." -- from A House of Dynamite
    Apr 27, 29: Domestic and Economic Policy

    "If simple, painless solutions to public problems existed, they would have been found long ago."  -- Alice Rivlin 
    • Edwards, ch. 13,

    May 4, 6: The Future of the Presidency

    "You don't have to be old in America to say of a world you lived in, that world is gone." -- Peggy Noonan

    • Readings on recent presidential action, TBA

    .

     


    Wednesday, December 10, 2014

    King & Gruber v. Burwell

    Our favorite ACA adviser is back in the news. Jonathan Gruber went before the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday and apologized for his comments about the "stupidity" of the American people in videos continue to serve as an anti-Obamacare wellspring. As the Democrats distanced themselves from Gruber's remarks, Elijah Cummings ended up on an unlikely tag team with Darrell Issa to berate Gruber. Although Issa denied this, you can be the judge.

    A recent Vox article argues that the most substantive aspect of Gruber's comments could be his implication that subsidies were only supposed to be given in state run marketplaces. This seems to support the plaintiff's case in King v. Burwell. This case, which, on November 7th, the Supreme Court decided to review, threatens the subsidies of thirty-six states.

    Odds and Ends and the Wrapup

    Per your request:

    CIA v. Castro's beard (no kidding)


    • The Vice President Joseph Biden
    • Speaker of the House John Boehner
    • President pro tempore of the Senate1 Patrick Leahy
    • Secretary of State John Kerry
    • Secretary of the Treasury Jacob Lew
    • Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel
    • Attorney General Eric Holder
    • Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewel
    • Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack
    • Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker
    • Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
    • Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Mathews Burwell
    • Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julián Castro
    • Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx
    • Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz
    • Secretary of Education Arne Duncan
    • Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert McDonald
    • Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson

    The Politics of Executive Action

    Professor Pitney noted in class that any future administration could undo Obama's executive action on immigration. Many, knowing that reality, express concern about the action's potential rollback.

    Here's Obama's response: “It’s true, theoretically, a future administration could do something that I think would be very damaging. It’s not likely, politically, that they reverse everything we've done.”

    Senate Intelligence Committee report on C.I.A. interrogation

    Yesterday the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report indicting the CIA’s use of interrogation techniques (i.e. torture) in the wake of 9/11 and the agencies subsequent practice of misleading the White House and Congress.

    Recently, Dick Cheney and other leaders have argued that the government’s interrogation program was essential for finding Osama bin Laden. However, the report contends that these methods “played no role in disrupting terrorism plots, capturing terrorist leaders, or even finding Bin Laden.”

    Responses to the report have been mixed. For more on the story visit: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/world/senate-intelligence-committee-cia-torture-report.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=span-ab-top-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

    Tuesday, December 9, 2014

    Obama on the Colbert Report

    Everyone believes they can be president. Can anyone be Stephen Colbert? Watch President Obama fill in for Colbert in last night's show (I found it absolutely hilarious).

    http://www.vanityfair.com/vf-hollywood/2014/12/obama-fills-in-for-colbert

    Practice Final

    The following should give you an idea of the exam format. As you prepare, also take a look at the air midterm.

    I. Briefly identify 12 of 14 items (4 points each). Explain each item's meaning and significance.
    • War Powers Resolution
    • NSC
    • "Game-changers" in campaigns
    • Executive agreements
    • The Russo-Japanese War
    • The Reagan Doctrine
    • Solicitor General
    • Policy streams
    • US v. Curtiss-Wright
    • Election of 1876
    • The 25th Amendment
    • Abe Fortas
    • Budget resolutions
    • The Little Rock executive order
    II. Short essays. Answer three of four. Each answer should take about half a page. (6 points each).
    • Explain: "But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have been called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all republicans, we are all federalists."
    • Why did William Daley have such a short tenure at the White House?
    • Explain: "The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization.We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit."
    • Tell how Twitter has changed the job of the White House press operation.

    III.Answer two of three essay questions (17 points each). Each answer should take about 2-3 large bluebook pages or 3-4 small bluebook pages
    • In Federalist 8, Hamilton wrote: “It is of the nature of war to increase the executive at the expense of the legislative authority.” Have the past two decades confirmed or disconfirmed this observation? Explain, with examples.
    • Could Rick Santorum have won the 2012 Republican nomination? If not, why not? If so, how? 
    • See the excerpt below. Do you agree or disagree? Explain with reference to course materials.
    A Democratic president, you'd think, would stick to Franklin D. Roosevelt or Jack Kennedy as role models. Not Barack Obama. As he faces tough times—economically and politically—I am told that he and his advisers are turning to an unusual source for inspiration: Ronald Reagan. Looking back, it shouldn't be a total surprise. On the campaign trail in 2008, Obama said nice things about the Gipper. Reagan, Obama said, "tapped into what people were already feeling, which was: we want clarity, we want optimism, we want a return to a sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing." (At the time, Obama's ode to Ronald seemed nothing more than a jab at the Clintons (who were infuriated), and a bid for Republican votes. But now I see that it was Obama's tell: the clue to how he views himself, politics, and the presidency. He thinks he is Reagan in reverse—a patient, genial game changer for the ages—and his confidence helped soothe the economic panic of a year ago. But it isn't clear whether the president really understands the causes of the Old Man's successes, or the sobering lessons of his failures.

    Bonus questions (one point each)
    • Larry O'Brien
    • Bud McFarlane
    • Ike Skelton
    • Peter Muldowney
    • Mike Mullen